Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Blog 3 Adolf Loos and Richard Docker


            This blog is going to be a comparison of two architects who were influential in the modernist movement. One of them is Adolf Loos and the other is Richard Docker. While both were working towards developing a modern architecture, their views and ideas towards what should be the outcome were different.
            In designing his modern houses, Adolf Loos used a system of planning that he called Raumplan. Raumplan was characterized by the organization of varying volumes of space, eliminating a central hall way and replacing it with a staircase, placing windows to allow in necessary light and frame views, and having a minimal exterior enclosure that was meant to reflect a difference from the public and the intimate interior. These ideas are reflected in one of Loos’s house Villa Muller. Loos considered this house to be his best execution of Raumplan.
            In Villa Muller the procession of rooms goes from low ceilings to gradually higher ceilings and eventually up a staircase into a double height sitting room. As you move through the house, the journey allows views into different rooms due to the varying volumes of spaces. Once you reach the top of the house there is a roof terrace with a large opening in a wall framing the Prague cathedral in the distance.

 The staircase that replaces the main hallway and the procession up volumes.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEileQD6-3yTPiz5_nzfic-S6g2cQeLUPpnHSZKOKtX3lqg7RgaEgSzeMklPFpkygupt33z6_WlWKzvFh52HEj1DApvSIKKH2j6uLV2VmtkHPawu2wvU2pIymkcB06BouhyphenhyphenbGzu5mXTDtv0/s1600/Adolf+Loos.jpg

Framed view of Prague cathedral
Image from Adolf Loos PowerPoint presentation


            The vast variation of interior spaces is contrasted by the exterior of the house. The outside is essentially a cube with large areas of plain white walls. This gives the appearance of being cold and uninviting which was the intention of Loos. He purposely made the exterior to function only as enclosure because he wanted to create as separation between the public outside on the private inside.
 Villa Muller's boxy. white exterior

http://liangzeng-arch1201.blogspot.com/2010/03/villa-muller.html


            Another modern architect of the time was Richard Docker. He was one of nineteen architects to design a house for the Werkbund Exhibition of 1927. The houses that were built were located in Weissenhof Estate which is a housing development in Stuttgart, Germany built for the exhibition. While some of the houses of the exhibition still exist, others were destroyed in World War II. One interesting fact is that Adolf Loos was supposed to be one of the architects to design a house in Weissenhof Estate but was removed from the list of architects because of disagreements with the Werkbund.

            In House 22, one of the houses designed by Richard Docker in the Werkbund Exposition, the design intent was to create a piece that was part of the whole Weissenhoff Estate. The goal was to present the estate as a whole rather than a collection of different styles. Docker once said, “Just as the individual space, the room, the piece of furniture, the aperture, the material, the construction system, etc., are interdependent members of a specific whole, the building itself is only one stone in the manifold structure of an urban organism.”
            In the layout of the house, the rooms are created by an intersection of the same geometric rectangular shape. While this is similar to Loos because of the intersection of spaces, it is different in that it is only an intersection in plan view. There is not a change in volumes like Loos. Also, because of the intersections of  rectangles, a main passage route is created. From this hallway you can access multiple rooms. This is another difference between Docker and Loos because Loos would design his houses to be moved through in a progression.

Floor Plan of House 22

Overlay showing the intersecting rectangle creating the passage way 
 
            A third difference between the two architects is that Docker seems to make more of a connection between the public and private. In House 22 there is a path from the garage to the terraced garden. The path continues up the garden onto a covered terreace that leads into the living room. The whole movement up to the covered terrace and into the living is visible to the public. This is in disagreement to how Loos believes the public and private should be separate. However, the procession up the small terraces to the covered terrace is reminiscent of the way one would move through the interior of one of Loos’s houses.
Pathway up terraced garden and into the living room. The red is the garage.

            As I stated before, both architects implemented ideas that moved architecture towards a more modern design but they differed in the ways that each moved forward.

1 comment:

  1. Wonderful post! Your research and analytical work is of a very high quality. The detailing of movement in the Docker plan is starting to pay off, similarly the Schroeder House (De Stjil) plan is similar to the Docker plan in its subdivision of interior space. there is a key central pivot corridor that separates the rooms which is in contrast to Loos' approach.
    I would like to read more about Docker and his influences, perhaps you could add to this in the future.

    DM

    ReplyDelete